Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine
https://iberoamjmed.com/article/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3700799
Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine
Original article

Effectiveness of the activities of supporters trained to prevent dementia

Kazue Sawami, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Mitsuo Kimura, Tetsuro Kitamura, Mihoko Furumi, Naoko Morisaki, Chizuko Suishu, Sonomi Hattori

Downloads: 0
Views: 972

Abstract

Introduction: We held a class for supporters in dementia prevention to nurture people who can carry out activities that prevent dementia and restrict its advancement. The objective was for enrollees who have completed the class to be able to visit the homes of older adults who have difficulty leaving their homes and help them carry out activities that prevent dementia. The trained supporters then evaluated the cognitive and psychological effects of interaction.
Method: The participants were local residents of Nara and Aichi Prefectures. In the supporter training to prevent dementia, we held 12 training sessions a year at Nara Medical University in Nara Prefecture and Shubun University in Aichi Prefecture. Supporters gather older people in the community to practice dementia prevention activities, and visit the homes of older adults who have difficulty leaving their homes to help the latter carry out activities that prevent dementia.
Results: A total of 128 people were enrolled in the training for supporters in dementia prevention. Pre- and post-training supporter evaluations showed significant improvements in both dementia-related skills and availability (p=0.000). In terms of the comparisons before and after visiting 31 older adults people with difficulty leaving their homes, the results of the immediate recall test for cognitive function among the older adults who participated in the activities designed to prevent dementia improved from 4.5 to 7.2, whereas the results of the belated recall test improved from 3.9 to 6.6 (p=0.000).
Conclusion: Training for supporters in dementia prevention significantly improved skills. A characteristic of the older adults who had difficulty leaving their homes was that their levels of activity and conversation were low, but the change to their daily lives, increased conversation, and improved activity through the visits of the supporters affected their minds and bodies and significantly improved their cognitive function.

Keywords

Dementia prevention; Supporters; Visit the homes; Conversation

References

1. Japan and UK Partnership. Global Age and Dementia Friendly Communities. June 28th, 2016.
2. Alzheimer's Association Japan. Document of requirements for both person with dementia and family can live in peace. 2019:1-8.
3. Omranifard V, Haghighizadeh E, Akouchekian S. Depression in Main Caregivers of Dementia Patients: Prevalence and Predictors. Adv Biomed Res. 2018;7:1-14. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.225924.
4. Shinkai S, Fujita K, Fujiwara Y, Kumagai S Amano H, Yoshida H, et al. Prognosis of different types of homeboundness among community-living older adults: two-year prospective study. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2005;52:627-38.
5. Arai K, Sakakibara H. Malnutrition and social isolation among elderly residents of city public housing. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2015;62:379-89.
6. Fujiwara K. Human resource training of people in community welfare - From community welfare promotion leaders training program . The Journal of the Department of Social Welfare, Kansai University of Social Welfare. 2016;19:51-6.
7. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. Changes and challenges facing Japanese society and the future of life security. White Paper on Health, Labor and Welfare. 2010:1-6.
8. Yonezawa M. Factors for Continuation of Volunteer Activity. Bulletin of Kansai University of Social Welfare. 2010;14:31-41.
9. Noto M, Nose M, Komatsu T, Inoue T, Kamijou K, Nakamura T. Examination of the Issues with and the Support System of Volunteer Activity for Elderly People with Dementia. Asian J Hum Serv. 2015;8:177-88.
10. Pendergrast T, Brown A, Sunnquist M, Jantke R, Newton JL, Strand EB, et al. Housebound versus nonhousebound patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic Illn. 2016;12: 292-307. doi: 10.1177/1742395316644770.
11. Andrew M, Mitnitski A, Kirkland SA, Rockwood K. The impact of social vulnerability on the survival of the fittest older adults. Age Ageing. 2012;41:161-65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr176.
12. Lang IA, Hubbard RE, Andrew MK, Llewellyn DJ, Melzer D, Rockwood K. Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1776-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02480.x.
13. Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006;21:140-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.
14. Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, Schneider JA, Kelly JF, Barnes LL,et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:234-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.234.
15. Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S, Capitanio JP, Cole SW. The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:733-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015240.
16. Abe K. Dementia- Now, what you really want to know 101. Musashino University Press. 2017;1-232.
17. Yamada H. Smile and cerebral blood flow. The Japan Society for Laughter and Humour Studies. 2012;19:86-95.
18. Takato Y, Morishita Y, Tokinaga M. Attitude of Home Care Nurses on Support to Maintain and Improve Functioning for Elderly Persons with Dementia. Journal of Kochi Gakuen Junior College. 2010;40:11-21.
19. Sharma A, Madaan V, Petty FD. Exercise for Mental Health. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8:106. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v08n0208a.
20. Kayyali R, Funnell G, Harrap N, Patel A. Can community pharmacy successfully bridge the gap in care for housebound patients? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019; 15: 425-39. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.06.011.
21. Kono A, Kai I, Sakato C, Harker JO, Rubenstein LZ. Effect of preventive home visits for ambulatory housebound elders in Japan: a pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16:293-9. doi: 10.1007/bf03324554.
22. Martin L. Marital status, social capital, material conditions and self-rated health: A population-based study. Health Policy. 2009;93: 172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.010.
23. Veenstraa G, Luginaah I, Wakefield S, Birch S, Eyles J, Elliott S. Who you know, where you live:social capital, neighborhood and health. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2799-818.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.013.
24. Orna BE, Ruth W, Amalia HM, Noga GS, Manfred SG. Individual-level analysis of social capital and health: A comparison of Arab and Jewish Israelis. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:900-10.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.025.
25. Anme T, Shinohara R, Sugisawa Y, Itoh S. Social interaction and mortality: A seven‐year longitudinal study of elderly people. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2006;53:681-7.
26. Misawa J, Kondo K. Social factors relating to depression among older people in Japan: analysis of longitudinal panel data from the AGES project., Aging Ment Health. 2019;23:1423-32. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1496225.


Submitted date:
02/18/2020

Reviewed date:
02/27/2020

Accepted date:
03/08/2020

Publication date:
03/08/2020

5e653de30e88251d7f6705af iberoamericanjm Articles
Links & Downloads

Iberoam J Med

Share this page
Page Sections